SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Shortening of the Short Refractory Periods in Short QT Syndrome.

Rollin, A; Gandjbakhch, E; Giustetto, C; Scrocco, C; Fourcade, C; Monteil, B; Mondoly, P; Cardin, C; Maupain, C; Gaita, F; et al. Rollin, A; Gandjbakhch, E; Giustetto, C; Scrocco, C; Fourcade, C; Monteil, B; Mondoly, P; Cardin, C; Maupain, C; Gaita, F; Maury, P (2017) Shortening of the Short Refractory Periods in Short QT Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc, 6 (6). e005684. ISSN 2047-9980 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005684
SGUL Authors: Scrocco, Chiara

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (685kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of short QT syndrome (SQTS) remains difficult in case of borderline QT values as often found in normal populations. Whether some shortening of refractory periods (RP) may help in differentiating SQTS from normal subjects is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial and right ventricular RP at the apex and right ventricular outflow tract as determined during standard electrophysiological study were compared between 16 SQTS patients (QTc 324±24 ms) and 15 controls with similar clinical characteristics (QTc 417±32 ms). Atrial RP were significantly shorter in SQTS compared with controls at 600- and 500-ms basic cycle lengths. Baseline ventricular RP were significantly shorter in SQTS patients than in controls, both at the apex and right ventricular outflow tract and for any cycle length. Differences remained significant for RP of any subsequent extrastimulus at any cycle length and any pacing site. A cut-off value of baseline RP <200 ms at the right ventricular outflow tract either at 600- or 500-ms cycle length had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of SQTS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SQTS have shorter ventricular RP than controls, both at baseline during various cycle lengths and after premature extrastimuli. A cut-off value of 200 ms at the right ventricular outflow tract during 600- and 500-ms basic cycle length may help in detecting true SQTS from normal subjects with borderline QT values.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: QT interval electrocardiography, refractory periods, risk stratification, short QT syndrome, sudden death, Action Potentials, Adolescent, Adult, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Function, Right, Case-Control Studies, Electrocardiography, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological, Time Factors, Ventricular Function, Right, Young Adult, Humans, Electrocardiography, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac, Case-Control Studies, Predictive Value of Tests, Action Potentials, Heart Rate, Atrial Function, Right, Ventricular Function, Right, Time Factors, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Male, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Young Adult, QT interval electrocardiography, refractory periods, risk stratification, short QT syndrome, sudden death
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: J Am Heart Assoc
ISSN: 2047-9980
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
31 May 2017Published
6 November 2017Published Online
10 April 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 28566296
Web of Science ID: WOS:000404098700039
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111886
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005684

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item