SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Maternal hemodynamics in screen‐positive and screen‐negative women of the ASPRE trial

Ling, HZ; Guy, GP; Bisquera, A; Poon, LC; Nicolaides, KH; Kametas, NA (2019) Maternal hemodynamics in screen‐positive and screen‐negative women of the ASPRE trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 54 (1). pp. 51-57. ISSN 0960-7692 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20125
SGUL Authors: Guy, Gavin Paul

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (949kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective To compare maternal hemodynamics and perinatal outcome, in pregnancies that do not develop pre‐eclampsia (PE) or deliver a small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) neonate, between those identified at 11–13 weeks' gestation as being screen positive or negative for preterm PE, by a combination of maternal factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, serum placental growth factor and pregnancy associated plasma protein‐A. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of maternal cardiovascular function, assessed using a bioreactance method, in women undergoing first‐trimester screening for PE. Maternal hemodynamics and perinatal outcome were compared between screen‐positive and screen‐negative women who did not have a medical comorbidity, did not develop PE or pregnancy‐induced hypertension and delivered at term a live neonate with birth weight between the 5th and 95th percentiles. A multilevel linear mixed‐effects model was used to compare the repeated measures of cardiac variables, controlling for maternal characteristics. Results The screen‐negative group (n = 926) had normal cardiac function changes across gestation, whereas the screen‐positive group (n = 170) demonstrated static or reduced cardiac output and stroke volume and higher mean arterial pressure and peripheral vascular resistance with advancing gestation. In the screen‐positive group, compared with screen‐negative women, birth‐weight Z‐score was shifted toward lower values, with prevalence of delivery of a neonate below the 35th, 30th or 25th percentile being about 70% higher, and the rate of operative delivery for fetal distress in labor also being higher. Conclusion Women who were screen positive for impaired placentation, even though they did not develop PE or deliver a SGA neonate, had pathological cardiac adaptation in pregnancy and increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Ling, HZ; Guy, GP; Bisquera, A; Poon, LC; Nicolaides, KH; Kametas, NA (2019) Maternal hemodynamics in screen‐positive and screen‐negative women of the ASPRE trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 54 (1). pp. 51-57.
Keywords: 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
ISSN: 0960-7692
Language: en
Dates:
DateEvent
9 July 2019Published
24 May 2019Published Online
1 April 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
1037116Fetal Medicine Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003123
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111578
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20125

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item