SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The impact of mental health recovery narratives on recipients experiencing mental health problems: Qualitative analysis and change model.

Rennick-Egglestone, S; Ramsay, A; McGranahan, R; Llewellyn-Beardsley, J; Hui, A; Pollock, K; Repper, J; Yeo, C; Ng, F; Roe, J; et al. Rennick-Egglestone, S; Ramsay, A; McGranahan, R; Llewellyn-Beardsley, J; Hui, A; Pollock, K; Repper, J; Yeo, C; Ng, F; Roe, J; Gillard, S; Thornicroft, G; Booth, S; Slade, M (2019) The impact of mental health recovery narratives on recipients experiencing mental health problems: Qualitative analysis and change model. PLoS One, 14 (12). e0226201. ISSN 1932-6203 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226201
SGUL Authors: Gillard, Steven George

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (907kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental health recovery narratives are stories of recovery from mental health problems. Narratives may impact in helpful and harmful ways on those who receive them. The objective of this paper is to develop a change model identifying the range of possible impacts and how they occur. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with experience of mental health problems and recovery (n = 77). Participants were asked to share a mental health recovery narrative and to describe the impact of other people's recovery narratives on their own recovery. A change model was generated through iterative thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS: Change is initiated when a recipient develops a connection to a narrator or to the events descripted in their narrative. Change is mediated by the recipient recognising experiences shared with the narrator, noticing the achievements or difficulties of the narrator, learning how recovery happens, or experiencing emotional release. Helpful outcomes of receiving recovery narratives are connectedness, validation, hope, empowerment, appreciation, reference shift and stigma reduction. Harmful outcomes are a sense of inadequacy, disconnection, pessimism and burden. Impact is positively moderated by the perceived authenticity of the narrative, and can be reduced if the recipient is experiencing a crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that incorporate the use of recovery narratives, such as peer support, anti-stigma campaigns and bibliotherapy, can use the change model to maximise benefit and minimise harms from narratives. Interventions should incorporate a diverse range of narratives available through different mediums to enable a range of recipients to connect with and benefit from this material. Service providers using recovery narratives should preserve authenticity so as to maximise impact, for example by avoiding excessive editing.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 Rennick-Egglestone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: MD Multidisciplinary, General Science & Technology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
ISSN: 1932-6203
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
13 December 2019Published
21 November 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
RP-PG-0615-20016National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
R01MH100470National Institutes of Healthhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
MR/S001255/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
MR/R023697/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
PubMed ID: 31834902
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111546
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226201

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item