SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence.

Rada, M-P; Pergialiotis, V; Betschart, C; Falconi, G; Haddad, JM; Doumouchtsis, SK (2019) A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence. Medicine (Baltimore), 98 (37). e16876. ISSN 1536-5964 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016876
SGUL Authors: Doumouchtsis, Stergios

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (391kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Randomized trials evaluating interventions for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been using variable outcome measures, reporting a variety of outcomes. Alongside this variation across studies, outcome-reporting flaws contribute to a limited use of research to inform clinical practice. The development and use of core outcome sets (COSs) in future trials would ensure that outcomes important to different stakeholders and primarily women with SUI are reported more consistently and comprehensively. METHODS: An international steering group including healthcare professionals, researchers, and women with urinary incontinence will guide the development of this COS. Potential outcomes will be identified through comprehensive literature reviews. These outcomes will be entered into an international, multiperspective online Delphi survey. All key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and women with urinary incontinence, will be invited to participate. The modified Delphi method encourages stakeholder group convergence toward collective agreement, also referred as consensus, core outcomes. DISCUSSION: Dissemination and implementation of the resulting COS within an international context will be promoted and reviewed. Embedding the COS for SUI within future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines could make a significant contribution to advancing the value of research in informing clinical practice, enhancing patient care and improving outcomes. The infrastructure created by developing a COS for SUI could be leveraged in other settings, for example, selecting research priorities and clinical practice guideline development.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Delphi Technique, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Research Design, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Humans, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Treatment Outcome, Research Design, Delphi Technique, Health Personnel, Female, Consensus Development Conferences as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic, core outcome set, delphi survey, randomised controlled trials, stress urinary incontinence, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Arthritis & Rheumatology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Medicine (Baltimore)
ISSN: 1536-5964
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2019Published
25 July 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 31517813
Web of Science ID: WOS:000488784400004
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111398
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016876

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item