SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Conde-Agudelo, A; Villar, J; Kennedy, SH; Papageorghiou, AT (2018) Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 52 (4). pp. 430-441. ISSN 1469-0705 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19117
SGUL Authors: Papageorghiou, Aris

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (144kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has been proposed for the routine surveillance of pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction (FGR), but the predictive performance of this test is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of CPR for predicting adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected FGR. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Lilacs were searched from inception to 31 July 2017 for cohort or cross-sectional studies reporting on the accuracy of CPR for predicting adverse perinatal and/or neurodevelopmental outcomes in singleton pregnancies with FGR suspected antenatally based on sonographic parameters. Summary receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves, pooled sensitivities and specificities, and summary likelihood ratios (LRs) were generated. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (including 4301 women) met the inclusion criteria. Summary ROC curves showed that the best predictive accuracy of CPR was for perinatal death and the worst was for neonatal acidosis, with areas under the summary ROC curves of 0.83 and 0.57, respectively. The predictive accuracy of CPR was moderate to high for perinatal death (pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 76%, respectively, and summary positive and negative LRs of 3.9 and 0.09, respectively) and low for composite of adverse perinatal outcomes, Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, 5-min Apgar score < 7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal acidosis and neonatal morbidity, with summary positive and negative LRs ranging from 1.1 to 2.5 and 0.3 to 0.9, respectively. An abnormal CPR result had moderate accuracy for predicting small-for-gestational age at birth (summary positive LR of 7.4). CPR had a higher predictive accuracy in pregnancies with suspected early-onset FGR. No study provided data for assessing the predictive accuracy of CPR for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. CONCLUSION: CPR appears to be useful in predicting perinatal death in pregnancies with suspected FGR. Nevertheless, before incorporating CPR into the routine clinical management of suspected FGR, randomized controlled trials should assess whether the use of CPR reduces perinatal death or other adverse perinatal outcomes. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Conde‐Agudelo, A. , Villar, J. , Kennedy, S. H. and Papageorghiou, A. T. (2018), Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 52: 430-441, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19117. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: Doppler, cerebroplacental ratio, fetal growth restriction, neurodevelopmental outcomes, perinatal outcome, predictive accuracy, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Middle Cerebral Artery, Placenta, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pulsatile Flow, Reference Standards, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Umbilical Arteries, Middle Cerebral Artery, Umbilical Arteries, Placenta, Humans, Fetal Growth Retardation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Predictive Value of Tests, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Pregnancy, Pulsatile Flow, Reference Standards, Infant, Newborn, Female, cerebroplacental ratio, Doppler, fetal growth restriction, neurodevelopmental outcomes, perinatal outcome, predictive accuracy, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
ISSN: 1469-0705
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
4 October 2018Published
5 September 2018Published Online
23 May 2018Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
UNSPECIFIEDBiomedical Research CentreUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 29920817
Web of Science ID: WOS:000446332600004
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111366
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19117

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item