SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Are socioenvironmental factors associated with psychotic symptoms in people with first-episode psychosis? A cross-sectional study of a West London clinical sample.

Tibber, MS; Kirkbride, JB; Mutsatsa, S; Harrison, I; Barnes, TRE; Joyce, EM; Huddy, V (2019) Are socioenvironmental factors associated with psychotic symptoms in people with first-episode psychosis? A cross-sectional study of a West London clinical sample. BMJ Open, 9 (9). e030448. ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030448
SGUL Authors: Harrison, Isobel

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (291kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether neighbourhood-level socioenvironmental factors including deprivation and inequality predict variance in psychotic symptoms after controlling for individual-level demographics. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was employed. SETTING: Data were originally collected from secondary care services within the UK boroughs of Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth, Kingston, Richmond, Merton, Sutton and Hounslow as part of the West London First-Episode Psychosis study. PARTICIPANTS: Complete case analyses were undertaken on 319 participants who met the following inclusion criteria: aged 16 years or over, resident in the study's catchment area, experiencing a first psychotic episode, with fewer than 12 weeks' exposure to antipsychotic medication and sufficient command of English to facilitate assessment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom dimension scores, derived from principal component analyses of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, were regressed on neighbourhood-level predictors, including population density, income deprivation, income inequality, social fragmentation, social cohesion, ethnic density and ethnic fragmentation, using multilevel regression. While age, gender and socioeconomic status were included as individual-level covariates, data on participant ethnicity were not available. RESULTS: Higher income inequality was associated with lower negative symptom scores (coefficient=-1.66, 95% CI -2.86 to -0.46, p<0.01) and higher levels of ethnic segregation were associated with lower positive symptom scores (coefficient=-2.32, 95% CI -4.17 to -0.48, p=0.01) after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence that particular characteristics of the environment may be linked to specific symptom clusters in psychosis. Longitudinal studies are required to begin to tease apart the underlying mechanisms involved as well as the causal direction of such associations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Adult psychiatry, Deprivation, Epidemiology, Inequality, Schizophrenia & psychotic disorders, Social capital
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
18 September 2019Published
19 August 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
064607/Z/01/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
101272/Z/13/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
PubMed ID: 31537571
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111290
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030448

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item