SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

DNA isolation protocol effects on nuclear DNA analysis by microarrays, droplet digital PCR, and whole genome sequencing, and on mitochondrial DNA copy number estimation.

Nacheva, E; Mokretar, K; Soenmez, A; Pittman, AM; Grace, C; Valli, R; Ejaz, A; Vattathil, S; Maserati, E; Houlden, H; et al. Nacheva, E; Mokretar, K; Soenmez, A; Pittman, AM; Grace, C; Valli, R; Ejaz, A; Vattathil, S; Maserati, E; Houlden, H; Taanman, J-W; Schapira, AH; Proukakis, C (2017) DNA isolation protocol effects on nuclear DNA analysis by microarrays, droplet digital PCR, and whole genome sequencing, and on mitochondrial DNA copy number estimation. PLoS One, 12 (7). ISSN 1932-6203 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180467
SGUL Authors: Pittman, Alan Michael

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Potential bias introduced during DNA isolation is inadequately explored, although it could have significant impact on downstream analysis. To investigate this in human brain, we isolated DNA from cerebellum and frontal cortex using spin columns under different conditions, and salting-out. We first analysed DNA using array CGH, which revealed a striking wave pattern suggesting primarily GC-rich cerebellar losses, even against matched frontal cortex DNA, with a similar pattern on a SNP array. The aCGH changes varied with the isolation protocol. Droplet digital PCR of two genes also showed protocol-dependent losses. Whole genome sequencing showed GC-dependent variation in coverage with spin column isolation from cerebellum. We also extracted and sequenced DNA from substantia nigra using salting-out and phenol / chloroform. The mtDNA copy number, assessed by reads mapping to the mitochondrial genome, was higher in substantia nigra when using phenol / chloroform. We thus provide evidence for significant method-dependent bias in DNA isolation from human brain, as reported in rat tissues. This may contribute to array "waves", and could affect copy number determination, particularly if mosaicism is being sought, and sequencing coverage. Variations in isolation protocol may also affect apparent mtDNA abundance.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2017 Nacheva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autopsy, Base Composition, Brain Chemistry, Case-Control Studies, Cell Nucleus, Cerebellum, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Frontal Lobe, Genome, Human, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Male, Microarray Analysis, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Parkinson Disease, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Substantia Nigra, Substantia Nigra, Cerebellum, Frontal Lobe, Cell Nucleus, Mitochondria, Humans, Parkinson Disease, DNA, Mitochondrial, Autopsy, Microarray Analysis, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Base Composition, Brain Chemistry, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome, Human, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, MD Multidisciplinary, General Science & Technology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
Article Number: e0180467
ISSN: 1932-6203
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
6 July 2017Published
15 June 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
G0802760Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
G1001253Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
G108/638Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
MR/J004758/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
WT089698Wellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
RCF103/AS/2014National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
RCF73TS2045989National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 28683077
Web of Science ID: WOS:000405335200040
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111068
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180467

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item