SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A Comparison of Heritability Estimates by Classical Twin Modeling and Based on Genome-Wide Genetic Relatedness for Cardiac Conduction Traits.

Nolte, IM; Jansweijer, JA; Riese, H; Asselbergs, FW; van der Harst, P; Spector, TD; Pinto, YM; Snieder, H; Jamshidi, Y (2017) A Comparison of Heritability Estimates by Classical Twin Modeling and Based on Genome-Wide Genetic Relatedness for Cardiac Conduction Traits. Twin Res Hum Genet, 20 (6). pp. 489-498. ISSN 1832-4274 https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2017.55
SGUL Authors: Jamshidi, Yalda

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (227kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary material) Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (283kB) | Preview

Abstract

Twin studies have found that ~50% of variance in electrocardiogram (ECG) traits can be explained by genetic factors. However, genetic variants identified through genome-wide association studies explain less than 10% of the total trait variability. Some have argued that the equal environment assumption for the classical twin model might be invalid, resulting in inflated narrow-sense heritability (h 2) estimates, thus explaining part of the 'missing h 2'. Genomic relatedness restricted maximum likelihood (GREML) estimation overcomes this issue. This method uses both family data and genome-wide coverage of common SNPs to determine the degree of relatedness between individuals to estimate both h 2 explained by common SNPs and total h 2. The aim of the current study is to characterize more reliably than previously possible ECG trait h 2 using GREML estimation, and to compare these outcomes to those of the classical twin model. We analyzed ECG traits (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, RV5+SV1, QTc interval, Sokolow-Lyon product, and Cornell product) in up to 3,133 twins from the TwinsUK cohort and derived h 2 estimates by both methods. GREML yielded h 2 estimates between 47% and 68%. Classical twin modeling provided similar h 2 estimates, except for the Cornell product, for which the best fit included no genetic factors. We found no evidence that the classical twin model leads to inflated h 2 estimates. Therefore, our study confirms the validity of the equal environment assumption for monozygotic and dizygotic twins and supports the robust basis for future studies exploring genetic variants responsible for the variance of ECG traits.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form, subsequent to peer review and/or editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Twin Research and Human Genetics (20: 6 (2017), pp. 489-498) published by Cambridge University Press. © The Author(s) 2017 https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2017.55
Keywords: arrhythmia, genetics, heritability, twin study, genetics, arrhythmia, heritability, twin study, Genetics & Heredity, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1702 Cognitive Science
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Cell Sciences (INCCCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Twin Res Hum Genet
ISSN: 1832-4274
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2017Published
17 October 2017Published Online
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
FP7/2007-2013Seventh Framework Programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004963
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 29039294
Web of Science ID: WOS:000417107400001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109470
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2017.55

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item