SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: Analysis of the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.

D'Antonio, F; Thilaganathan, B; Laoreti, A; Khalil, A; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). (2018) Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: Analysis of the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 52 (5). pp. 586-592. ISSN 1469-0705 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18916
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (699kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies progressing beyond 34 weeks of gestation. The secondary aim was to determine the predictive accuracy of different weight discordant cut-offs in predicting neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of all twin pregnancies booked for antenatal care in four hospitals in the Southwest Thames region of London Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) over a period of ten years. The ultrasound data were obtained by a computerized search of each hospital's obstetric ultrasound computer database, while the outcome details were obtained from the computerized maternity and neonatal records. The primary outcome was the incidence of composite neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies with birthweight discordance. Logistic regression was used to identify and adjust for potential confounders, while the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-nine twin pregnancies (760 Dichorionic, 179 Monochorionic) were included. The gestation at birth and birthweight decile were significantly lower in the pregnancies complicated by neonatal morbidity compared to those which were not (p<0.001 for both). At multivariable logistic regression, gestation at birth (p<0.001), birthweight decile (p=0.029), birthweight discordance (p=0.019) but not chorionicity (p=0.477) or the presence of at least one small for gestational age twin (p=0.245), were independently associated with the risk of neonatal morbidity. There was a progressive increase in the risk of neonatal morbidity with increasing birthweight discordance. Despite this association, birthweight discordance showed an overall poor predictive accuracy in detecting neonatal morbidity, with an AUC of 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.63) with an optimal cut-off of 17.6%, showing a sensitivity and a specificity of 35.2% (95% CI 27.8-43.2) and 83.2% (95% CI 80.0-85.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Inter-twin birthweight discordance is independently associated with the risk of neonatal morbidity in twins born after 34 weeks' gestation, irrespective of the chorionicity or the diagnosis of SGA in either twin. However, its predictive accuracy for neonatal morbidity is poor.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: D'Antonio, F. , Thilaganathan, B. , Laoreti, A. , Khalil, A. and , (2018), Birth‐weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 52: 586-592, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18916. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: morbidity, outcome, twin pregnancies, weight discordance, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
ISSN: 1469-0705
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
5 November 2018Published
8 October 2018Published Online
13 October 2017Published Online
25 September 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 29028139
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109253
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18916

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item