SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Effectiveness of trauma-focused psychological therapies compared to usual postnatal care for treating post-traumatic stress symptoms in women following traumatic birth: a systematic review protocol.

Furuta, M; Spain, D; Bick, D; Ng, ESW; Sin, J (2016) Effectiveness of trauma-focused psychological therapies compared to usual postnatal care for treating post-traumatic stress symptoms in women following traumatic birth: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open, 6 (11). e013697. ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013697
SGUL Authors: Sin, Pui Han Jacqueline

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (697kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maternal mental health has been largely neglected in the literature. Women, however, may be vulnerable to developing post-traumatic stress symptoms or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), following traumatic birth. In turn, this may affect their capacity for child rearing and ability to form a secure bond with their baby and impact on the wider family. Trauma-focused psychological therapies (TFPT) are widely regarded as effective and acceptable interventions for PTSD in general and clinical populations. Relatively little is known about the effectiveness of TFPT for women postpartum who have post-traumatic stress symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a review to assess the effectiveness of TFPT, compared with usual postpartum care, as a treatment for post-traumatic stress symptoms or PTSD for women following traumatic birth. Using a priori search criteria, we will search for randomised controlled trials (RCT) in four databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO and OpenGrey. We will use search terms that relate to the population, TFPT and comparators. Screening of search results and data extraction will be undertaken by two reviewers, independently. Risk of bias will be assessed in RCTs which meet the review criteria. Data will be analysed using the following methods, as appropriate: narrative synthesis; meta-analysis; subgroup analysis and meta-regression. DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS: As this work comprises a synthesis of existing studies, ethical approvals are not required. Results will be disseminated at conferences and in publications.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH, MENTAL HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
24 November 2016Published
1 November 2016Published Online
25 October 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 27884855
Web of Science ID: WOS:000391303400058
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/108593
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013697

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item