SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Bhide, A; Caric, V; Arulkumaran, S (2016) Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 133 (3). pp. 297-300. ISSN 1879-3479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.031
SGUL Authors: Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam Bhide, Amarnath

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (91kB)
[img]
Preview
Image (TIFF) (Supplementary Information) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Image (TIFF) (Supplementary Information) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and to validate a previously established prediction model. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were obtained for women with one prior low-transverse cesarean procedure who underwent a trial of labor with a cephalic singleton pregnancy at term at one UK hospital between January 2000 and August 2013. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to identify maternal demographic characteristics significantly associated with successful VBAC and factors independently associated with this outcome, respectively. A prediction model was built, and predicted probabilities were compared with observed frequencies. For validation, probabilities were also calculated by a previous prediction model. RESULTS: Overall, 1463 women formed the cohort. Successful vaginal delivery was achieved in 1050 (71.8%) women. The only factors significantly associated with unsuccessful VBAC were Asian (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.23) or African (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.64) ethnic origin, and previous cesarean for failure to progress (OR 6.39, 95% CI 4.81-8.49). The predicted and observed probability of successful VBAC were well correlated (Spearman ρ, 0.905; P=0.002). The established prediction model was less accurate. CONCLUSION: Previous cesarean performed for failure to progress and Asian/African ethnic origin were associated with unsuccessful VBAC. The performance of a previous prediction model was inferior.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Cesarean, Delivery, Labor, Vaginal birth after cesarean, Cesarean, Delivery, Labor, Vaginal birth after cesarean, Cesarean, Delivery, Labor, Vaginal birth after cesarean, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Vascular (INCCVA)
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 June 2016Published
1 February 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 26952353
Web of Science ID: WOS:000377833800010
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/108185
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.031

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 22 Aug 2016.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item