SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Periprocedural anticoagulation in the uninterrupted edoxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for ablation of atrial fibrillation (ELIMINATE-AF) trial.

Hohnloser, SH; Camm, AJ; Cappato, R; Diener, H-C; Heidbüchel, H; Mont, L; Morillo, CA; Lanz, H-J; Rauer, H; Reimitz, P-E; et al. Hohnloser, SH; Camm, AJ; Cappato, R; Diener, H-C; Heidbüchel, H; Mont, L; Morillo, CA; Lanz, H-J; Rauer, H; Reimitz, P-E; Smolnik, R; Kautzner, J (2021) Periprocedural anticoagulation in the uninterrupted edoxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for ablation of atrial fibrillation (ELIMINATE-AF) trial. Europace, 23 (1). pp. 65-72. ISSN 1532-2092 https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa199
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (195kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS : This post hoc analysis of ELIMINATE-AF evaluated requirements of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and procedure-related bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing ablation with uninterrupted edoxaban or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS : Patients were randomized 2:1 to once-daily edoxaban 60 mg (or dose-reduced 30 mg) or dose-adjusted VKA (target international normalized ratio: 2.0-3.0). Uninterrupted anticoagulation was mandated for 21-28 days' pre-ablation and 90 days' post-ablation. During ablation, UFH administration targeted an activated clotting time (ACT) of 300-400 s. Periprocedural bleeding was differentiated between procedure-related (bleeding at puncture side, cardiac tamponade) and unrelated events. Of 614 randomized patients, 553 received study drug and underwent catheter ablation (edoxaban n = 375; VKA n = 178). The median (Q1-Q3) time from last dose to ablation procedure was 14.8 (13.3-16.5) vs. 16.5 (14.8-19.5) h (edoxaban vs. VKA group, respectively). Mean ACT (SD) ≥300 s was observed in 52% edoxaban- vs. 76% VKA-treated patients, despite a higher mean (SD) UFH dose in the edoxaban vs. VKA group [14 261 (6397) IU vs. 11 473 (4300) IU; exploratory P-value < 0.0001]. In the edoxaban group, 13 patients (3.5%) had procedure-related bleeds of whom 9 had received an UFH dose above the median (13 000 IU). In the VKA arm, 7 patients (3.9%) had procedure-related bleeds of whom 3 had received an UFH dose above the median (10 225 IU). CONCLUSION : The rate of procedure-related major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding did not differ between the treatment arms despite higher doses of UFH used with edoxaban vs. VKA to achieve a target ACT during AF ablation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Keywords: Ablation, Anticoagulant, Atrial fibrillation, Edoxaban, Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, Periprocedural anticoagulation, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Europace
ISSN: 1532-2092
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2021Published
29 November 2020Published Online
19 June 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 33249467
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112704
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa199

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item