SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Randomized comparison of oesophageal protection with a temperature control device: results of the IMPACT study.

Leung, LWM; Bajpai, A; Zuberi, Z; Li, A; Norman, M; Kaba, RA; Akhtar, Z; Evranos, B; Gonna, H; Harding, I; et al. Leung, LWM; Bajpai, A; Zuberi, Z; Li, A; Norman, M; Kaba, RA; Akhtar, Z; Evranos, B; Gonna, H; Harding, I; Sohal, M; Al-Subaie, N; Louis-Auguste, J; Hayat, J; Gallagher, MM (2021) Randomized comparison of oesophageal protection with a temperature control device: results of the IMPACT study. Europace, 23 (2). pp. 205-215. ISSN 1532-2092 https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa276
SGUL Authors: Gallagher, Mark Michael

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (855kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS : Thermal injury to the oesophagus is an important cause of life-threatening complication after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Thermal protection of the oesophageal lumen by infusing cold liquid reduces thermal injury to a limited extent. We tested the ability of a more powerful method of oesophageal temperature control to reduce the incidence of thermal injury. METHODS AND RESULTS : A single-centre, prospective, double-blinded randomized trial was used to investigate the ability of the ensoETM device to protect the oesophagus from thermal injury. This device was compared in a 1:1 randomization with a control group of standard practice utilizing a single-point temperature probe. In the protected group, the device maintained the luminal temperature at 4°C during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for AF under general anaesthesia. Endoscopic examination was performed at 7 days post-ablation and oesophageal injury was scored. The patient and the endoscopist were blinded to the randomization. We recruited 188 patients, of whom 120 underwent endoscopy. Thermal injury to the mucosa was significantly more common in the control group than in those receiving oesophageal protection (12/60 vs. 2/60; P = 0.008), with a trend toward reduction in gastroparesis (6/60 vs. 2/60, P = 0.27). There was no difference between groups in the duration of RF or in the force applied (P value range= 0.2-0.9). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy duration were similar (P = 0.97, P = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSION : Thermal protection of the oesophagus significantly reduces ablation-related thermal injury compared with standard care. This method of oesophageal protection is safe and does not compromise the efficacy or efficiency of the ablation procedure.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Atrio-oesophageal fistula, Catheter ablation, Gastroparesis, Oesophagus, Temperature control, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Europace
ISSN: 1532-2092
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
February 2021Published
17 November 2020Published Online
18 August 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 33205201
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112653
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa276

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item