SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in identifying the level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Di Mascio, D; Greco, F; Rizzo, G; Khalil, A; Buca, D; Sorrentino, F; Vasciaveo, L; Greco, P; Nappi, L; D'Antonio, F (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in identifying the level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 100 (2). pp. 210-219. ISSN 1600-0412 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14001
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (10MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The role of prenatal ultrasound in correctly identifying the level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida has yet to be determined. The primary aim of this systematic review was to report the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in determining the level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida. The secondary aim was to elucidate whether prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the diagnostic performance of prenatal imaging in correctly identifying the level of the lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were studies reporting the agreement between ultrasound, MRI and postnatal or post-mortem assessment of fetuses with spina bifida. Agreement was defined as: complete (when the upper level of the lesion detected prenatally was the same recorded at postnatal or post-mortem evaluation), within one (when the upper level of the lesion recorded prenatally was within one vertebral body higher or lower than that reported postnatally) and within two vertebral bodies (when the upper level of the lesion recorded prenatally was within two vertebral bodies higher or lower than that reported postnatally or postmortem evaluation). Meta-analyses of proportions were used to combine data. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (655 fetuses) were included. Ultrasound was able to identify the correct level of the lesion in 40.9% (95% CI 26.9-55.6) of cases. The upper level of the lesion recorded on ultrasound was within one vertebral body in 76.2% (95% CI 65.0-85.9) of cases, while within two segments in 92.4% (95% CI 84.3-97.7). Fetal MRI detected the exact level of the lesion in 42.5% (95% CI 35.9-45.2) of cases; the level of the lesion recorded on MRI was higher in 26.4% (95% CI 20.0-33.3) of cases and lower in 32.4% (95% CI 25.5-39.7) than that confirmed postnatally. The upper level of the lesion recorded on MRI was within one vertebral body in 76.2% (95% CI 65.9-85.2) of cases, while within two segments in 94.2% (95% CI 90.2-97.2). CONCLUSIONS: Both ultrasound and MRI have a moderate diagnostic accuracy in identify the upper level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Di Mascio, D, Greco, F, Rizzo, G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in identifying the level of the lesion in fetuses with open spina bifida: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100: 210– 219, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14001. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: MRI, diagnostic acuracy, magnetic resonance imaging, myelomeningocele, spina bifida, ultrasound, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
ISSN: 1600-0412
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
20 January 2021Published
11 October 2020Published Online
14 September 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 32979219
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112451
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14001

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item