SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Association between 3D endovaginal and 2D perineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and symptoms in women presenting with mid‐urethral sling complications

Taithongchai, A; Pandeva, I; Sultan, AH; Thakar, R (2021) Association between 3D endovaginal and 2D perineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and symptoms in women presenting with mid‐urethral sling complications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 57 (4). pp. 639-646. ISSN 1469-0705 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23130
SGUL Authors: Sultan, Abdul Hameed Thakar, Ranee

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (8MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives To present the characteristics of women attending a tertiary urogynecology pelvic floor scan clinic with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) complications and examine the association between patient symptoms and findings on two‐dimensional (2D) perineal and three‐dimensional (3D) endovaginal ultrasound. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study of all women with MUS complications referred to a specialist pelvic floor ultrasound clinic between October 2016 and October 2018. Detailed history was obtained regarding their symptoms and time of onset. All patients underwent 2D perineal and 3D endovaginal ultrasound assessment. The association between patient symptoms and ultrasound findings was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Only symptomatic women with a single MUS, without other pelvic floor mesh, prior mesh excision or bulking agents, were included in the regression analysis. Results A total of 311 women with a history of MUS surgery were seen during the study period. Vaginal and/or non‐vaginal pain was reported by 80% of patients and this was the primary presenting complaint in 59% of the patients. One‐third of the patients reported symptoms starting within 4 weeks after surgery. The data of 172 patients were included in the regression analysis. MUS position within the rhabdosphincter was significantly associated with voiding dysfunction (odds ratio (OR), 10.6 (95% CI, 2.2–50.9); P = 0.003). Voiding dysfunction was highest in those with C‐shaped MUS both at rest and on Valsalva maneuver (OR, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.3–7.6); P < 0.001). MUS position in the distal third of the urethra was significantly associated with a higher rate of recurrent urinary tract infection (OR, 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3–6.3); P = 0.01). Conclusions Pelvic floor ultrasound can provide insight into the position and shape of the MUS, which could explain some patient symptoms and guide management or surgical planning.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: complications, endovaginal ultrasound, mesh, mid-urethral sling, perineal ultrasound, tension-free vaginal tape, three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound, 3-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound, Complications, Endovaginal ultrasound, Mesh, mid-urethral slings, perineal ultrasound, tension-free vaginal tapes, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
ISSN: 1469-0705
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 April 2021Published
22 September 2020Published Online
11 September 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 32959432
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112423
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23130

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item