SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Investigation of a monoclonal antibody against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, expressed as secretory IgA1 and IgA2 in plants.

Teh, AY-H; Cavacini, L; Hu, Y; Kumru, OS; Xiong, J; Bolick, DT; Joshi, SB; Grünwald-Gruber, C; Altmann, F; Klempner, M; et al. Teh, AY-H; Cavacini, L; Hu, Y; Kumru, OS; Xiong, J; Bolick, DT; Joshi, SB; Grünwald-Gruber, C; Altmann, F; Klempner, M; Guerrant, RL; Volkin, DB; Wang, Y; Ma, JK-C (2021) Investigation of a monoclonal antibody against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, expressed as secretory IgA1 and IgA2 in plants. Gut Microbes, 13 (1). pp. 1-14. ISSN 1949-0984 https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020.1859813
SGUL Authors: Ma, Julian Teh, Yi Hui

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Passive immunization with antibodies is a promising approach against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea, a prevalent disease in LMICs. The objective of this study was to investigate expression of a monoclonal anti-ETEC CfaE secretory IgA antibody in N. benthamiana plants, with a view to facilitating access to ETEC passive immunotherapy. SIgA1 and SIgA2 forms of mAb 68-81 were produced by co-expressing the light and engineered heavy chains with J chain and secretory component in N. benthamiana. Antibody expression and assembly were compared with CHO-derived antibodies by SDS-PAGE, western blotting, size-exclusion chromatography and LC-MS peptide mapping. N-linked glycosylation was assessed by rapid fluorescence/mass spectrometry and LC-ESI-MS. Susceptibility to gastric digestion was assessed in an in vitro model. Antibody function was compared for antigen binding, a Caco-2 cell-based ETEC adhesion assay, an ETEC hemagglutination inhibition assay and a murine in vivo challenge study. SIgA1 assembly appeared superior to SIgA2 in plants. Both sub-classes exhibited resistance to degradation by simulated gastric fluid, comparable to CHO-produced 68-61 SIgA1. The plant expressed SIgAs had more homogeneous N-glycosylation than CHO-derived SIgAs, but no alteration of in vitro functional activity was observed, including antibodies expressed in a plant line engineered for mammalian-like N glycosylation. The plant-derived SIgA2 mAb demonstrated protection against diarrhea in a murine infection model. Although antibody yield and purification need to be optimized, anti-ETEC SIgA antibodies produced in a low-cost plant platform are functionally equivalent to CHO antibodies, and provide promise for passive immunotherapy in LMICs.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Nicotiana benthamiana, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibody, passive immunization, secretory IgA
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Gut Microbes
ISSN: 1949-0984
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
13 January 2021Published
23 November 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
OPP1194526Bill and Melinda Gates Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865
OPP1173647Bill and Melinda Gates Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865
UNSPECIFIEDSir Joseph Hotung Charitable TrustUNSPECIFIED
774078European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004431
760331European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004431
PubMed ID: 33439092
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112681
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020.1859813

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item