SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Timing of carotid endarterectomy and clinical outcomes.

Azhar, B; Wafi, A; Budge, J; Loftus, I (2020) Timing of carotid endarterectomy and clinical outcomes. Ann Transl Med, 8 (19). p. 1267. ISSN 2305-5839 https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1130
SGUL Authors: Loftus, Ian

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (163kB) | Preview

Abstract

The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis has evolved in practice over time. Key landmark trials outlined the benefit of performing CEA in the recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, defined as revascularisation within 6 months of the index neurological event. Further evidence and sub-analysis demonstrate that performing CEA within 2 weeks of symptoms has the maximal benefit in reducing stroke free survival and is associated with a safe perioperative complication profile. This has translated into guideline recommendations and widespread clinical practice. The case for performing urgent CEA (within 48 hours of index neurological event) over early CEA (within 2 weeks) has been put forward and studied. Data examining perioperative complications for urgent CEA are mostly derived from retrospective single series studies. A moderate balance exists in the literature for the safety and risk of urgent CEA. Although many studies present acceptable perioperative stroke and mortality rates associated with urgent CEA, evidence still exists that the perioperative complications may not be insignificant. This is particularly the case if the presenting neurology is a stroke, rather than a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or amaurosis fugax. This should be contextualised in the practice of modern aggressive medical therapy with dual antiplatelets and statins, with evidence suggesting a reduction in recurrent ischaemic events prior to surgical intervention. Careful patient selection, presenting neurology and medical therapy is likely to be a key feature in considering urgent CEA versus early CEA.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Keywords: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenosis, stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), Carotid endarterectomy (CEA), stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), carotid artery stenosis
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Ann Transl Med
ISSN: 2305-5839
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
October 2020Published
13 May 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 33178799
Web of Science ID: WOS:000581630100061
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112638
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1130

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 26 Nov 2020.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item