SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Secondary non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomy: an effectiveness study in a public health setting.

Guy, GP; Hargrave, J; Dunn, R; Price, K; Short, J; Thilaganathan, B; SAFE test collaborative (2021) Secondary non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomy: an effectiveness study in a public health setting. BJOG, 128 (2). pp. 440-446. ISSN 1471-0528 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16464
SGUL Authors: Thilaganathan, Baskaran Guy, Gavin Paul

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (200kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (9MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary screening using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a routine NHS setting including test performance, turn-around times (TATs) and no-call (failure to obtain result) rates. To examine the influence of maternal and fetal characteristics on test performance. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: London teaching hospital. SAMPLE: A total of 8651 pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomy using NIPT provided by an NHS cell-free DNA screening laboratory - the SAFE laboratory. METHODS: Screening test evaluation and TATs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors of no-call results and reported by low fetal fraction (<2%), very high fetal fraction (>40%) and processing failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test performance, TATs and no-call rates, factors affecting no-call results. RESULTS: Average TAT was 4.0 days (95% CI 4.0-4.2 days). Test sensitivities for trisomies 21 and 13/18 were 98.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.9%) and 90.4% (95% CI 80.0-96.8%), respectively. The overall no-call rate was 32/8651 (0.37%, 95% CI 0.26-0.52%). The overall risk of a no-call result was influenced by gestational age, dichorionic twin pregnancy, history of malignancy and pregnancies affected by trisomy 13/18, but not by maternal weight or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput NIPT can be effectively embedded into a public health NHS setting. TATs of 4 days and no-calls of <0.5% were well within clinically desirable tolerances. Gestational age, maternal weight, assisted reproductive techniques, use of low-molecular-weight heparin and past history of malignancy did not have major impacts on test no-call rates and should not constitute reasons for withholding the option of NIPT from women. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Turn-around times of 4 days, no-call (test failure) rates of 0.37% and highly accurate NIPT can be successfully embedded in the NHS.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Cell-free DNA, failed sample, fetal fraction, first-trimester screening, no-call rate, non-invasive prenatal testing, trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21, twin pregnancy, SAFE test collaborative, ell-free DNA, failed sample, fetal fraction, first-trimester screening, no-call rate, non-invasive prenatal testing, trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21, twin pregnancy, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: BJOG
ISSN: 1471-0528
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
3 January 2021Published
14 September 2020Published Online
4 August 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 32790109
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112343
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16464

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item