SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

How well do laboratories adhere to recommended guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in Europe? The CArdiac MARker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) study.

De Wolf, HA; Langlois, MR; Suvisaari, J; Aakre, KM; Baum, H; Collinson, P; Duff, CJ; Gruson, D; Hammerer-Lercher, A; Pulkki, K; et al. De Wolf, HA; Langlois, MR; Suvisaari, J; Aakre, KM; Baum, H; Collinson, P; Duff, CJ; Gruson, D; Hammerer-Lercher, A; Pulkki, K; Stankovic, S; Stavljenic-Rukavina, A; Laitinen, P; EFLM Task Group on Cardiac Markers (2020) How well do laboratories adhere to recommended guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in Europe? The CArdiac MARker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) study. Clin Chim Acta, 508. pp. 267-272. ISSN 1873-3492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.038
SGUL Authors: Collinson, Paul

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (878kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The CArdiac MARker Guidelines Uptake in Europe Study (CAMARGUE) initiated by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) aims to survey the current use of evidence-based guidelines for dyslipidemia testing in Europe. METHODS: In 2019 a web-based questionnaire was distributed via EFLM National Societies to clinical laboratories in Europe. Questions covered pre-analytics, analytical methods, measurement units, flagging of decision thresholds, and use of decision-enhancing comments. RESULTS: Returns were obtained from 452 laboratories from 28 countries. Most laboratories always use nonfasting blood samples for lipid assays (66%). Lipid profiles are reported in mmol/L by 59% of the laboratories, mainly from 14 countries promoting the use of SI units. Important differences in flagging of decision thresholds were observed, with less than half of the laboratories applying the guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol threshold. Only 17% of the laboratories add an alert comment when familial hypercholesterolemia is suspected and 23% when risk of pancreatitis from hypertriglyceridemia is high. CONCLUSIONS: There are marked differences among laboratories in Europe in terms of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical lipid management that could have an important clinical impact. This relates to different availability of assays or different laboratory practices on reporting and flagging of lipid profiles.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Analytical, Guidelines, Lipids, Post-analytical, Pre-analytical, EFLM Task Group on Cardiac Markers, Guidelines, Lipids, Pre-analytical, Analytical, Post-analytical, Analytical, Guidelines, Lipids, Post-analytical, Pre-analytical, 1103 Clinical Sciences, General Clinical Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Chim Acta
ISSN: 1873-3492
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2020Published
23 May 2020Published Online
19 May 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 32454048
Web of Science ID: WOS:000549228300039
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112030
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.038

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item