SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.

Woodham, LA; Round, J; Stenfors, T; Bujacz, A; Karlgren, K; Jivram, T; Riklefs, V; Poulton, E; Poulton, T (2019) Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation. PLoS One, 14 (4). ISSN 1932-6203 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215597
SGUL Authors: Round, Jonathan Edward Collier

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Medical error is a significant cause of patient harms in clinical practice, but education and training are recognised as having a key role in minimising their incidence. The use of virtual patient (VP) activities targeting training in medical error allows learners to practice patient management in a safe environment. The inclusion of branched decision-making elements in the activities has the potential to drive additional generative cognitive processing and improved learning outcomes, but the increased cognitive load on learning risks negatively affecting learner motivation. The aim of this study is to better understand the impact that the inclusion of decision-making and inducing errors within the VP activities has on learner motivation. METHODS: Using a repeated study design, over a period of six weeks we provided undergraduate medical students at six institutions in three countries with a series of six VPs written around errors in paediatric practice. Participants were divided into two groups and received either linearly structured VPs or ones that incorporated branched decision-making elements. Having completed all the VPs, each participant was asked to complete a survey designed to assess their motivation and learning strategies. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that in general, there was no significant difference in learner motivation between those receiving the linear VPs and those who received branched decision-making VPs. The same results were generally reflected across all six institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrated that the inclusion of decision-making elements did not make a significant difference to undergraduate medical students' motivation, perceived self-efficacy or adopted learning strategies. The length of the intervention was sufficient for learners to overcome any increased cognitive load associated with branched decision-making elements being included in VPs. Further work is required to establish any immediate impact within periods shorter than the length of our study or upon achieved learning outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 Woodham et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: MD Multidisciplinary, General Science & Technology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
Article Number: e0215597
ISSN: 1932-6203
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
23 April 2019Published
4 April 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 31013295
Web of Science ID: WOS:000465223900025
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/110863
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215597

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item