SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Safety, accuracy, and cost effectiveness of bedside bolt external ventricular drains (EVDs) in comparison to tunnelled EVDs inserted in theatres.

Roach, J; Gaastra, B; Bulters, D; Shtaya, A (2019) Safety, accuracy, and cost effectiveness of bedside bolt external ventricular drains (EVDs) in comparison to tunnelled EVDs inserted in theatres. World Neurosurg. ISSN 1878-8769 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.106
SGUL Authors: Shtaya, Anan BY

[img] PDF Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 February 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (4MB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is frequently required in neurosurgical patients to divert CSF and monitor intracranial pressure. The usual practise is the tunnelled EVD technique performed in operating theatres. EVD insertion through a bolt in intensive care is also described. We employ both practices in our institute. Herein, we compare the indications, accuracy, safety and costs of the two techniques. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained EVD data-base of all patients undergoing first frontal EVD placement between Jan 2010-Dec 2015. Those with preceding CSF infection were excluded. We compared bolt EVD with tunnelled EVD techniques in terms of accuracy of EVD tip location by analysing CT scans to grade catheter tip location as optimal (ipsilateral frontal horn) or otherwise suboptimal, and complications that include infection and revision rates. RESULTS: 579 eligible patients aged 3 months to 84 years were identified. 430 had tunnelled EVDs and 149 bolt EVDs. The most frequent diagnosis was intracranial haemorrhage (73% bolt vs 50.4% tunnelled group (p<0.001)). Other diagnoses included tumour (4.7% bolt vs 19.1% tunnelled (p<0.001)), traumatic brain injury (17.5% bolt vs 17.4% tunnelled). In the bolt EVD group 66.4% of EVD tips were optimal, compared to 61.0% in the tunnelled group (p=0.33). Infection was confirmed in 15 (10.0%) bolt EVDs compared to 61 (14.2%) tunnelled EVDs (p=0.2). Each bolt EVD kit costs £260 while placing a tunnelled one in theatre costs £1316. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside bolt EVD placement is safe, accurate and cost effective in selective patients with haemorrhage related hydrocephalus.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: CSF, External ventricular drain (EVD), bolt, hydrocephalus, tunnelled
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: World Neurosurg
ISSN: 1878-8769
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
5 February 2019Published Online
14 January 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 30735879
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: http://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/110679
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.106

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item