SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Adoption of Lung Protective ventilation IN patients undergoing Emergency laparotomy: the ALPINE study. A prospective multicentre observational study

Watson, X; Chereshneva, M; Odor, PM; Chis Ster, DI; Pan-London Perioperative Audit and Research Network (PLAN); Cecconi, M (2018) Adoption of Lung Protective ventilation IN patients undergoing Emergency laparotomy: the ALPINE study. A prospective multicentre observational study. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 121 (4). pp. 909-917. ISSN 0007-0912 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.048
SGUL Authors: Chis Ster, Delizia Irina

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (79kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Statistical methods) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (18kB)

Abstract

Background Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The primary aim of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery are ventilated using a lung-protective ventilation strategy comprising of tidal volume ≤8 ml kg−1 ideal body weight−1, PEEP >5 cm H2O, and recruitment manoeuvres. The secondary aim was to investigate the association between ventilation factors (lung-protective ventilation strategy, intraoperative FiO2, and peak inspiratory pressure) and the occurrence of PPCs. Methods Data were collected prospectively in 28 hospitals across London as part of routine National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Patients were followed up for 7 days. Complications were defined according to the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definition. Results Data were collected from 568 patients. The median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] tidal volume observed was 500 ml (450–540 ml), corresponding to a median tidal volume of 8 ml kg−1 ideal body weight−1 (IQR: 7.2–9.1 ml). An lung-protective ventilation strategy was employed in 4.9% (28/568) of patients and was not protective against the occurrence of PPCs in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio=1.06; P=0.69). A peak inspiratory pressure of <30 cm H2O was protective against the development of PPC (hazard ratio=0.46; confidence interval: 0.30–0.72; P=0.001). The median FiO2 was 0.5 (IQR: 0.44–0.53) and an increase in FiO2 by 5% increased the risk of developing a PPC by 8% (2.6–14.1%; P=0.008). Conclusions Both intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure and FiO2 are independent factors significantly associated with the development of a postoperative pulmonary complication in emergency laparotomy patients. Further studies are required to identify their causality effect and to demonstrate if their manipulation could lead to better clinical outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Anesthesiology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN: 0007-0912
Dates:
DateEvent
October 2018Published
29 June 2018Published Online
23 May 2018Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109790
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.048

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item