SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementing HIV testing in primary care in East London: protocol for an interrupted time series analysis

Leber, W; Beresford, L; Nightingale, C; Barbosa, EC; Morris, S; El-Shogri, F; McMullen, H; Boomla, K; Delpech, V; Brown, A; et al. Leber, W; Beresford, L; Nightingale, C; Barbosa, EC; Morris, S; El-Shogri, F; McMullen, H; Boomla, K; Delpech, V; Brown, A; Hutchinson, J; Apea, V; Symonds, M; Gilliham, S; Creighton, S; Shahmanesh, M; Fulop, N; Estcourt, C; Anderson, J; Figueroa, J; Griffiths, C (2017) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementing HIV testing in primary care in East London: protocol for an interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open, 7 (12). e018163. ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018163
SGUL Authors: Nightingale, Claire

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (721kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction HIV remains underdiagnosed. Guidelines recommend routine HIV testing in primary care, but evidence on implementing testing is lacking. In a previous study, the Rapid HIV Assessment 2 (RHIVA2) cluster randomised controlled trial, we showed that providing training and rapid point-of-care HIV testing at general practice registration (RHIVA2 intervention) in Hackney led to cost-effective, increased and earlier diagnosis of HIV. However, interventions effective in a trial context may be less so when implemented in routine practice. We describe the protocol for an MRC phase IV implementation programme, evaluating the impact of rolling out the RHIVA2 intervention in a post-trial setting. We will use a longitudinal study to examine if the post-trial implementation in Hackney practices is effective and cost-effective, and a cross-sectional study to compare Hackney with two adjacent boroughs providing usual primary care (Newham) and an enhanced service promoting HIV testing in primary care (Tower Hamlets). Methods and analysis Service evaluation using interrupted time series and cost-effectiveness analyses. We will include all general practices in three contiguous high HIV prevalence East London boroughs. All adults aged 16 and above registered with the practices will be included. The interventions to be examined are: a post-trial RHIVA2 implementation programme (including practice-based education and training, external quality assurance, incentive payments for rapid HIV testing and incorporation of rapid HIV testing in the sexual health Local Enhanced Service) in Hackney; the general practice sexual health Network Improved Service in Tower Hamlets and usual care in Newham. Coprimary outcomes are rates of HIV testing and new HIV diagnoses. Ethics and dissemination The chair of the Camden and Islington NHS Research Ethics Committee, London, has endorsed this programme as an evaluation of routine care. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported to commissioners.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Dates:
DateEvent
14 December 2017Published
27 September 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute of Health ResearchUNSPECIFIED
URI: http://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109666
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018163

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item