SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Interventions to Reduce Adult Nursing Turnover: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Halter, M; Pelone, F; Boiko, O; Beighton, C; Harris, R; Gale, J; Gourlay, S; Drennan, V (2017) Interventions to Reduce Adult Nursing Turnover: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Open Nurs J, 11. pp. 108-123. ISSN 1874-4346 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010108
SGUL Authors: Drennan, Vari MacDougal

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (520kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Nurse turnover is an issue of concern in health care systems internationally. Understanding which interventions are effective to reduce turnover rates is important to managers and health care organisations. Despite a plethora of reviews of such interventions, strength of evidence is hard to determine. Objective: We aimed to review literature on interventions to reduce turnover in nurses working in the adult health care services in developed economies. Method: We conducted an overview (systematic review of systematic reviews) using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, CINAHL plus and SCOPUS and forward searching. We included reviews published between 1990 and January 2015 in English. We carried out parallel blinded selection, extraction of data and assessment of bias, using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. We carried out a narrative synthesis. Results: Despite the large body of published reviews, only seven reviews met the inclusion criteria. These provide moderate quality review evidence, albeit from poorly controlled primary studies. They provide evidence of effect of a small number of interventions which decrease turnover or increase retention of nurses, these being preceptorship of new graduates and leadership for group cohesion. Conclusion: We highlight that a large body of reviews does not equate with a large body of high quality evidence. Agreement as to the measures and terminology to be used together with well-designed, funded primary research to provide robust evidence for nurse and human resource managers to base their nurse retention strategies on is urgently required.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2017 Halter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: Intervention, Nurses, Nursing staff, Personnel turnover, Review, Systematic, Workforce
Journal or Publication Title: Open Nurs J
ISSN: 1874-4346
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 August 2017Published Online
8 June 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 29299084
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: http://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109547
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010108

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item