Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detailed information on the profile of Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients presenting their first arrhythmic event (AE) after prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is limited. OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiologic and genetic profiles of patients who exhibited their first documented AE as aborted cardiac arrest (CA) (group A) with those in whom the AE was documented after prophylactic ICD implantation (group B); 2) To characterize group B patients' profile using the Class II indications for ICD implantation established by HRS/EHRA/APHRS Expert Consensus Statement in 2013. METHODS: A survey of 23 centers from 10 Western and 4 Asian countries enabled data collection of 678 BrS patients with AE (group A, n=426; group B, n=252). RESULTS: First AE occurred in group B patients 6.7 years later than in group A (46.1+ 13.3 vs. 39.4+15.1, P<0.001). Group B patients had a higher incidence of family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and SCN5A mutations. Of the 252 group B patients, 189 (75%) complied with the HRS/EHRA/APHRS indications whereas the remaining 63 (25%) did not. CONCLUSION: BrS patients with first AE documented after prophylactic ICD implantation exhibited their AE at a later age with a higher incidence of positive family history of SCD and SCN5A mutations compared to those presenting with an aborted CA. Only 75% of patients who suffered an AE after receiving a prophylactic ICD complied with the 2013 Class II indications, suggesting efforts are still required for improving risk stratification.