SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Risk of infection in type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared with the general population: a matched cohort study

Carey, IM; Critchley, JA; DeWilde, S; Harris, T; Hosking, FJ; Cook, DG (2018) Risk of infection in type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared with the general population: a matched cohort study. Diabetes Care, 41 (3). pp. 513-521. ISSN 1935-5548 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2131
SGUL Authors: Carey, Iain Miller

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We describe in detail the burden of infections in adults with diabetes within a large national population cohort. We also compare infection rates between patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study compared 102,493 English primary care patients aged 40–89 years with a diabetes diagnosis by 2008 (n = 5,863 T1DM and n = 96,630 T2DM) with 203,518 age-sex-practice–matched control subjects without diabetes. Infection rates during 2008–2015, compiled from primary care and linked hospital and mortality records, were compared across 19 individual infection categories. These were further summarized as any requiring a prescription or hospitalization or as cause of death. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) between 1) people with diabetes and control subjects and 2) T1DM and T2DM adjusted for age, sex, smoking, BMI, and deprivation. RESULTS Compared with control subjects without diabetes, patients with diabetes had higher rates for all infections, with the highest IRRs seen for bone and joint infections, sepsis, and cellulitis. IRRs for infection-related hospitalizations were 3.71 (95% CI 3.27–4.21) for T1DM and 1.88 (95% CI 1.83–1.92) for T2DM. A direct comparison of types confirmed higher adjusted risks for T1DM versus T2DM (death from infection IRR 2.19 [95% CI 1.75–2.74]). We estimate that 6% of infection-related hospitalizations and 12% of infection-related deaths were attributable to diabetes. CONCLUSIONS People with diabetes, particularly T1DM, are at increased risk of serious infection, representing an important population burden. Strategies that reduce the risk of developing severe infections and poor treatment outcomes are under-researched and should be explored.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article has been accepted for publication in Diabetes Care. The final published version is available at https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2131
Keywords: Endocrinology & Metabolism, 11 Medical And Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Diabetes Care
ISSN: 1935-5548
Dates:
DateEvent
1 March 2018Published
12 January 2018Published Online
7 December 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
URI: http://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109375
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2131

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item