SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Crobach, MJT; Planche, T; Eckert, C; Barbut, F; Terveer, EM; Dekkers, OM; Wilcox, MH; Kuijper, EJ (2016) European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect, 22 (Suppl 4). S63-S81. ISSN 1469-0691 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010
SGUL Authors: Planche, Timothy David

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (958kB) | Preview

Abstract

In 2009 the first European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guideline for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was launched. Since then newer tests for diagnosing CDI have become available, especially nucleic acid amplification tests. The main objectives of this update of the guidance document are to summarize the currently available evidence concerning laboratory diagnosis of CDI and to formulate and revise recommendations to optimize CDI testing. This update is essential to improve the diagnosis of CDI and to improve uniformity in CDI diagnosis for surveillance purposes among Europe. An electronic search for literature concerning the laboratory diagnosis of CDI was performed. Studies evaluating a commercial laboratory test compared to a reference test were also included in a meta-analysis. The commercial tests that were evaluated included enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting glutamate dehydrogenase, EIAs detecting toxins A and B and nucleic acid amplification tests. Recommendations were formulated by an executive committee, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence were graded using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. No single commercial test can be used as a stand-alone test for diagnosing CDI as a result of inadequate positive predictive values at low CDI prevalence. Therefore, the use of a two-step algorithm is recommended. Samples without free toxin detected by toxins A and B EIA but with positive glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, nucleic acid amplification test or toxigenic culture results need clinical evaluation to discern CDI from asymptomatic carriage.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Clostridium difficile infection, diagnosis, guideline, recommendations, review, Algorithms, Bacterial Toxins, Clostridium Infections, Clostridium difficile, DNA, Bacterial, Early Diagnosis, European Union, Humans, Population Surveillance, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Societies, Medical, Clostridium difficile infection, diagnosis, guideline, recommendations, review, Microbiology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Microbiol Infect
ISSN: 1469-0691
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 August 2016Published
25 July 2016Published Online
10 March 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 27460910
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109285
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item