SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery.

Ahmad, T; Bouwman, RA; Grigoras, I; Aldecoa, C; Hofer, C; Hoeft, A; Holt, P; Fleisher, LA; Buhre, W; Pearse, RM; et al. Ahmad, T; Bouwman, RA; Grigoras, I; Aldecoa, C; Hofer, C; Hoeft, A; Holt, P; Fleisher, LA; Buhre, W; Pearse, RM; International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS) group (2017) Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery. Br J Anaesth, 119 (2). pp. 258-266. ISSN 1471-6771 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex185
SGUL Authors: Holt, Peter James Edward

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (429kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary material) Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (96kB)

Abstract

Background: The incidence and impact of postoperative complications are poorly described. Failure-to-rescue, the rate of death following complications, is an important quality measure for perioperative care but has not been investigated across multiple health care systems. Methods: We analysed data collected during the International Surgical Outcomes Study, an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Hospitals were ranked by quintiles according to surgical procedural volume (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest). For each quintile we assessed in-hospital complications rates, mortality, and failure-to-rescue. We repeated this analysis ranking hospitals by risk-adjusted complication rates (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest). Results: A total of 44 814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries were available for analysis. Of these, 7508 (17%) developed one or more postoperative complication, with 207 deaths in hospital (0.5%), giving an overall failure-to-rescue rate of 2.8%. When hospitals were ranked in quintiles by procedural volume, we identified a three-fold variation in mortality (Q1: 0.6% vs Q5: 0.2%) and a two-fold variation in failure-to-rescue (Q1: 3.6% vs Q5: 1.7%). Ranking hospitals in quintiles by risk-adjusted complication rate further confirmed the presence of important variations in failure-to-rescue, indicating differences between hospitals in the risk of death among patients after they develop complications. Conclusions: Comparison of failure-to-rescue rates across health care systems suggests the presence of preventable postoperative deaths. Using such metrics, developing nations could benefit from a data-driven approach to quality improvement, which has proved effective in high-income countries.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in British Journal of Anaesthesia following peer review. The version of record Ahmad, T; Bouwman, RA; Grigoras, I; Aldecoa, C; Hofer, C; Hoeft, A; Holt, P; Fleisher, LA; Buhre, W; Pearse, RM; et al. (2017) Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery. Br J Anaesth, 119 (2). pp. 258-266 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex185
Keywords: methods, mortality, operative, postoperative care, statistics and numerical data, surgical procedures, postoperative care, methods, postoperative care, statistics and numerical data, surgical procedures, operative, mortality, postoperative care, methods, methods, mortality, operative, postoperative care, statistics and numerical data, surgical procedures, Anesthesiology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Vascular & Cardiac Surgery (INCCVC)
Journal or Publication Title: Br J Anaesth
ISSN: 1471-6771
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 August 2017Published
8 July 2017Published Online
21 May 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 28854536
Web of Science ID: WOS:000406549900063
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109187
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex185

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item