SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists.

Mohtashami, F; von Dadelszen, P; Allaire, C (2011) A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists. JSLS, 15 (3). pp. 365-372. ISSN 1086-8089 https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356477
SGUL Authors: von Dadelszen, Peter

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern regarding the quality of surgical training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs is focusing attention on competency based education. Because open surgical skills cannot necessarily be translated into laparoscopic skills and with minimally invasive surgery becoming standard in operative gynecology, the discrepancy in training between obstetrics and gynecology will widen. Training on surgical simulators with virtual reality may improve surgical skills. However, before incorporation into training programs for gynecology residents the validity of such instruments needs to first be established. We sought to prove the construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator, the SurgicalSim(TM), by showing its ability to distinguish between surgeons with different laparoscopic experience. METHODS: Eleven gynecologic surgeons (experts) and 11 perinatologists (controls) completed 3 tasks on the simulator, and 10 performance parameters were compared. RESULTS: The experts performed faster, more efficiently, and with fewer errors, proving the construct validity of the SurgicalSim. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic virtual reality simulators can measure relevant surgical skills and so distinguish between subjects having different skill levels. Hence, these simulators could be integrated into gynecology resident endoscopic training and utilized for objective assessment. Second, the skills required for competency in obstetrics cannot necessarily be utilized for better performance in laparoscopic gynecology.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2011 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
Keywords: Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Computer Simulation, Dissection, Female, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Gynecology, Humans, Internship and Residency, Laparoscopy, Male, Obstetrics, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Humans, Laparoscopy, Dissection, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Task Performance and Analysis, Gynecology, Obstetrics, Competency-Based Education, Internship and Residency, Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, User-Computer Interface, Female, Male, Surgery, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: JSLS
ISSN: 1086-8089
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 July 2011Published
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
PubMed ID: 21985726
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: http://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107499
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356477

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item